Wholesome 8===D

There are two things I would like to remind the world of:

1. Free Market Libertarianism!!$#%#@!
2. Atlas Shrugged: The Perfect Christmas Gift!

You'll also want to give this a listen (MP3):

• "Making a Virtue of Selfishness? A Debate about Ayn Rand's Ethics" with Onkar Ghate (Ayn Rand Institute) and Mike Huemer (CU-Boulder)

And and special message to Libertarians (and really just the big 'L' ones): Objectivism is the largest liability of your movement. You might think it's cool to have them on board, but it's actually a really bad idea.

Why?

The best thing about Libertarianism is that it's simple. Objectivism keeps trying to say that it's simple--all you need to know is A=A and some how it all makes sense--but it's becoming clearer and clearer that it's not that. As much as some people talk about the length of the tax code they have probably never checked the page count of Atlas Shrugged--I'm sure it's on their shelves even if it's just for show--and the rest of Ayn Rand's works and her successors attempts to make Objectivism intelligible.

Libertarians, you're on the verge of having a very clear and concise message to communicate to the electorate that you mostly all agree on, don't fuck it up with Ayn Rand's tangential ramblings.

Seriously, buy a copy of Atlas Shrugged for everyone on your Christmas list.

If you know me, you probably know that I have very few kind words to say about Ayn Rand, Objectivists and Libertarians. I was reminded of this while watching some episodes of Penn and Teller's: Bullshit! (for FREE!) on Google Video.

Why do Libertarians feel then need to keep talking? As if we haven't heard their line of Bullshit! a million times before? You know, it seems to constantly net them.... what? I'm guessing about a good 3% of the vote (on average) in general elections? Could it be that people have heard it all before and have come to realize, like I have, that Libertarians don't actually develop interesting ideas and policies as much as they have this language and dogma everyone in their insular, incestuous, sectarian, cult-like organizations cling too? You are part of the mystery.

Don't get me wrong, I don't think all of that Libertarian language and dogma is bad. I don't think all of the Christian language and dogma is bad. I strongly agree with two of the ten commandments and I'm on the fence about a few more. But it's not about that, it's about people who are so dogmatic the only ideas bouncing around in their heads are the ones their cult-culture tells them are okay to have bouncing around in their heads. Then they go and try to proselytize the rest of us, on usenet, on email lists, on college campuses, on Showtime, and on Google Video.

So, why do I want you to go buy dozens of copies of Atlas Shrugged? Because it's one of the best ideas I've heard so far for creating a utopia. Any Rand John Galt (the protagonist in the book) has this brilliant plan to get all of his high dogmatic friends to leave the rest of the world behind and go establish a community somewhere far away to teach the rest of the world a lesson. You see, Ayn Rand John Galt's character is so narcissistic and self-righteous that he believes the world just couldn't get along without people like him. I can't think of anything that I would like more, or that would bring us closer to a utopia, then getting everyone like that to leave.

Please, every extremist organization in the United States go move to compounds in the middle of nowhere. Take your guns, your drugs, you're boatloads of Bullshit! and leave. I'm tired of putting up with you. When the rest of society barely notices or cares that you're gone and we go on living our lives in peace, you can rest assured that you taught us a lesson.


Now, if you really care about whoever it is on your Christmas list and you don't want to see them go, you might want to consider getting them a copy of The Open and Closed Mind by Milton Rokeach. Sure, it's 46 years old (making it a little younger than then the 49 year old Atlas Shrugged), but it might have been just that much more ahead of it's time. Either way, it's certainly better researched than Ayn Rand's shitty fiction.

The boxy goodness below was posted by me in this thread on TLC about the War on Christmas what a whiny bitch Bill O'Reilly is, that was turned in to a discussion about why Trey Parker and Matt Stone hate liberals and why the Democrats "lost" the presidential election.

I don't think Secularism had any direct effect on the Diebold CEO who promised to "deliver" Ohio to Bush (who recently resigned after fraud accusations). That had more to do with Republicans being cowards and breaking the law. Trey Parker and Matt Stone are pussies for selling out to the Libertarian Party. They're just tools now, they're not comedians anymore -- as you'll notice if you happen to catch any recent episodes of South Park. I'd imagine they get together with Penn and Teller at least once a week and masturbate to Ayn Rand while manning the glory hole at the CATO institute. Despite any recent "bump" Bush's approval ratings have followed a steady downward trend since 9/11. Bush's approval ratings among blacks were at something like 2% just a couple months ago. The Margin of error in most of these polls is around 2%. Which means not only is it possible, but even likely, that he has 0% approval among blacks in the United States.

That was slightly edited from the original version.

So, there's a little wholesomedick for you, if you missed me.